
A distributed team needs two separate document sets: one for employees, governed by local employment law, and one for independent contractors, governed by the services agreement and local classification tests.
Most companies run one set and adapt it. That adaptation is where legal exposure enters, because a document written for an employee describes control, and control is what reclassification turns on.
A distributed team needs two document sets.
For an employee: the employment contract under local law, tax withholding registration, statutory notices required in that jurisdiction, and retained records for the local retention period.
For an independent contractor: a services agreement with defined scope, identity verification, the correct tax status form, invoices, and acceptance records.
The sets overlap only on identity. Everything else diverges, because an employer directs how work is done and carries the obligations that follow, while a hiring company buys a defined result.
One folder, one template, one process holds until a tax authority asks how a relationship was classified, or an invoice fails a finance review, or someone leaves and the agreement turns out not to cover the work product.
An employment contract creates an ongoing relationship under the labour law of the country where the person works, and it is expected to describe hours, reporting and method. A services agreement creates an obligation to deliver a defined result, and describing hours, reporting and method inside it works against the contractor's status.
That inversion is the whole point. The same clause is correct in one document and evidence against you in the other.
Onboarding a person in another country means collecting a defined set of documents before the first payment or the first payday. The set differs by relationship type and by jurisdiction, so neither list below is complete on its own.
Employee, hired through an employer-of-record:
Independent contractor:
The fourth item on the contractor list is the one most often skipped, and it is the reason payments fail on a name mismatch.
Four mechanisms account for most documentation failures in distributed teams, and none of them looks like a problem while it is happening.
Control language is any provision specifying when, where or how the work is done: fixed hours, a named manager, a prescribed method. In an employment contract it belongs there. In a services agreement it becomes written evidence that the relationship is not what it says it is.
California. Labor Code section 2775 presumes a worker is an employee unless the hiring company proves all three prongs of the ABC test. Prong A asks whether the worker is free from control both under the contract and in fact.
United Kingdom. In Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2011] UKSC 41 the Supreme Court held that written terms can be set aside where they do not reflect the true agreement between the parties. Uber BV v Aslam [2021] UKSC 5 applied that reasoning to find drivers were workers despite contracts stating otherwise. (As of August 2026.)
The paragraph you copied from the employment template is the paragraph that gets read back to you.
For a US payer, the correct form depends on who the person is. Form W-9 from US persons, including US citizens living abroad. Form W-8BEN from non-US individuals, or Form W-8BEN-E from non-US entities. Collected before the first payment, retained rather than filed.
Expiry is where this goes wrong. A Form W-8BEN signed in 2026 is generally valid through 31 December 2029: the clock runs to the last day of the third calendar year after signing, and not to the anniversary.
Nobody has a reason to look at it in the meantime, so the year it lapses is the year somebody discovers there is no documentary support for payments already made. (As of August 2026.)
Documents change by jurisdiction, and translating a template is not the same as having a second one.
France. Article L1221-3 of the Labour Code requires a written employment contract to be drawn up in French. An employer cannot invoke against an employee a clause of a contract concluded in breach of that article where the clause is to the employee's detriment.
Belgium, Dutch-speaking region. The Flemish Language Decree of 19 July 1973 requires employment documents to be in Dutch, and a document in the wrong language is null. The nullity is asymmetric: an employee can still rely on provisions in their favour, and the employer cannot rely on anything. (As of August 2026.)
Poland. From 1 April 2026, structured e-invoicing through the KSeF system has been mandatory for most VAT-registered businesses established in Poland, and an invoice does not legally exist until KSeF accepts it. Until 31 December 2026, the smallest suppliers can stay outside while their monthly business-to-business invoicing remains at or below PLN 10,000 gross. (As of August 2026.)
Rights in work product start from different defaults depending on whether the person is an employee or an independent contractor.
Employees, across the EU. Under article 2(3) of Directive 2009/24/EC, where a computer program is created by an employee in the execution of their duties or following the employer's instructions, the employer is exclusively entitled to exercise all economic rights in it, unless the contract provides otherwise. France goes further: article L113-9 of the Intellectual Property Code makes the economic rights in software created by employees the property of the employer.
Independent contractors. The position rests on the agreement. Section 29(1) of the German Copyright Act means copyright itself cannot be transferred between living parties, so a hiring company takes rights of use under section 31 instead. (As of August 2026.)
Keeping contractor documentation compliant across countries means four things have to be true at once, and missing one makes the whole set stop working as evidence: the right document type for the relationship, the right jurisdiction-specific version of it, the right tax status form collected before the first payment, and a retention period the local authority accepts.
In most companies of this size, People Ops collects the documents and Finance uses them, and nobody owns whether the set is still current.
A folder does not notice any of that.
Once a quarter, check:
Poland. Retention runs on separate clocks. From 1 January 2019, employee records must be kept for 10 years from the end of the calendar year in which the employment relationship ended, and for 50 years for anyone hired before 1999. Contractor records follow tax and commercial rules instead. (As of August 2026.)
A documentation system should generate the correct set per relationship type and per country, collect documents from the person directly, track expiry on tax status forms, and export a complete record for one person for one period.
The question to ask a vendor: which countries does your document set differ in, exactly how, and who maintains that difference?
Kleos operates as contractor-of-record and as employer-of-record in 200+ countries each, which means both document sets are produced by the same system rather than assembled by the hiring company.
See our guide to the seven features to check in global contractor management software.
A Form W-8BEN is generally valid from the date it is signed until the last day of the third calendar year after signing, so a form signed in 2026 runs through 31 December 2029. A change in the contractor's circumstances can end validity earlier. A lapsed form leaves the payer without documentary support for payments made after expiry.
No. An employment contract is expected to specify hours, reporting and method, and a services agreement that specifies the same things creates written evidence of control over an independent contractor. Adapting one template to serve both purposes is the most common documentation failure in distributed teams.
An employment contract creates an ongoing relationship under the labour law of the country where the person works, with the obligations that follow from that status. A services agreement creates an obligation to deliver a defined result, leaves method and schedule with the contractor, and is governed by contract law plus local classification tests.
Where a company contracts the person directly, the company holds the documentation obligation even if a platform supplies the process. Where a contractor-of-record signs the agreement with the contractor, the obligation for that engagement sits with the contractor-of-record.
Retention periods are set by local tax and commercial law, and they differ from employment retention rules even inside one country. In Poland, employee records are kept for 10 years from the end of the calendar year in which employment ended. Contractor records follow tax and commercial rules, with their own start date and period.
Pull up your contractor agreements and check whether any of them specify working hours.
Last updated: August 2026.